Reviewers assigned While you can learn something about the make up of the scientific review group, it is never Sep 16, 2021 · Are you a student at a higher institution or an early-career researcher who is striving to understand and master the peer review process so to increase the odds of getting a paper published in the Journal of Forestry Research or another reputable, peer-reviewed, scientific journal? In this paper, a young, senior editor provides a handbook of the peer review process based on his decadal Editorial Review After completing internal checks, each new submission is assigned to an Academic Editor with relevant expertise. Generally speaking, “Reviewer Assigned” means that the manuscript has been assigned to a peer reviewer, that is, invitations have been sent out to peer reviewers to review your manuscript. In case of draft pull requests, set when draft is released (ready_for_review event subscription required). Also note that, some times, the reported status may revert from “Under Review” to “Reviewers Assigned”; this would man that the reviewers initially accepted the task, but then withdrew. Takedown request View Feb 15, 2023 · I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. The editor reviews the manuscript against our publication criteria and determines whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. Dec 4, 2017 · In some journals reviewer assigned status meant that reviewer has been sent the review invitation. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. This is probably because one of the reviewers declined after initially accepting the After passing the initial check, it stayed with the "Reviewers Assigned" status until 12 Oct and went Under Review on 13 Oct. Either way there's nothing to do except wait. Still, this had never happened to me and I wonder how to proceed now. Sep 16, 2019 · My paper was in "Reviewer invited" state for close to 7 months and recently changed to the status "Under Review". Instead of the normal process streamline in the Editorial Manager that usually goes through "with editor-reviewer invited-under review-reject/accept", mine has gone into "awaiting reviewer assignment-reviewer assigned" and haven't heard from them for a month. The reason with it is now Editor Assigned can be due to several reasons. May 24, 2016 · Some journals use the term “reviewers assigned” to mean that the paper is under review at present. You can also see an overview of your invitations to review, and access each journal's Editorial Manager site, where you can accept or May 12, 2021 · Perhaps, the subject editor assigned requires more time for assessing the manuscript. Learn why the status of your manuscript may change from 'under review' to 'reviewers assigned' during the peer review process. Stage 2: Editor assigned Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. Aug 5, 2021 · Answer: When reviewers are invited by the journal editor, the status is changed to 'Reviewers Assigned' or 'Invited Reviewers' and as soon as the reviewers agree to review the manuscript, the status is changed to 'Under Review'. Nov 12, 2024 · 请问sci大修返修后状态从underreview变成reviewersassig审稿流程中的“under review”状态变化为“reviewers assigned”意味着审稿过程中遇到了某些挑战,特别是当审稿人的意见不一致时。 What does awaiting reviewer assignment mean under review? Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. They are experts in the field, but perhaps not in the exact area of your application. Editors will Sep 20, 2017 · Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. Oct 9, 2019 · Answer: The status of a manuscript can differ across journals and publishers. Answer: Each journal has its own status descriptions, and the meaning for a certain status can change from journal to journal. So, now, you need to wait for the peer review comments. A 'Reinvite Reviewer' button appears at the right, which would allow you to invite the reviewer immediately, or to set as alternate or proposed. Possibly, your paper has been assigned to an editorial assistant who will check it to see that it meets the journals requirements. Jul 4, 2017 · The status change to "Reviewers assigned" clearly indicates that review invitations have been sent out. Each indicates a particular phase of the review process that usually happens in a certain order, however an individual submission can skip a phase, or return back to an earlier phase, depending on Editor actions. From your query, it seems reviewers have been assigned for your manuscript. Once the required number of reviewers accept the invitation, the status will change to "Under review" once again and the actual peer review process will begin. Find out the possible reasons for reviewer changes and how to interpret the updates from journals. Not set if the title contains skip assign or assign skip keywords. The round robin algorithm chooses reviewers based on who's received the least recent review request, focusing on alternating between all members of the team regardless of the number of outstanding reviews they currently have. However, it is an essential element of scientific publishing, ensuring that a manuscript is relevant and suitable for publication and upholding scientific integrity. I wrote an email to Aug 5, 2020 · The quick change from ‘Editor Assigned’ to ‘Reviewer Assigned’ means that the Associate Editor (AE) had a look at your manuscript and decided that it fits the journal scope and also investigates a new or interesting topic. Accounts to automatically set to reviewers when the pull request is opened (opened event subscription required), eg foo, bar. My paper was submitted to Nature 50 days ago, and soon it was in the "All Reviewers Assigned" stage but then stuck there for >40 days. Nov 22, 2024 · 英文论文状态Reviewers Assigned的意思英文论文发表过程中,更新状态告知作者论文进程。Reviewers Assigned这一状态意味着什么?它表示论文已向同行专家发出审稿邀请。英文论文欲被接受,需通过审稿流程,邀请同行专 Sep 17, 2020 · The peer-review process can appear intimidating and complex. Is this the reviewing process or a stage before that? Frequently asked questionsHow do editors select reviewers? How can I become a peer reviewer? Should I agree to review a manuscript if I have co-authored an article with an author of this Aug 10, 2023 · "Reviewers Assigned"状态意味着期刊编辑已经向潜在的同行评审专家发出了审稿邀请。 这个状态持续6天,并且日期更新了2次,这通常表明编辑在邀请审稿人过程中可能遇到了一些动态变化。 Dec 18, 2023 · Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript. When status changes to under review it means at least two reviewer have responded to the After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should be sent for peer review. If that is the case, it might take anywhere between a few weeks to several months for peer review to complete, and consequently, the next status change to happen. Does not support team reviewers The peer review process can be broadly summarized into 10 steps, although these steps can vary slightly between journals. Peer review helps to maintain high standards for published research. This depends a lot on the manuscript management system, and the editorial practices. Once this is done, it will be assigned to an Associate Editor Oct 6, 2021 · Answer: Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. Where an Editor is on the author list or has any other competing interest regarding a specific manuscript, another member of the Editorial Board will be assigned to oversee peer review. Since then, the article has been jumping between " Waiting for Reviewer Assignment " and " Contacting Potential Reviewers " (10 changes of status now). Why did it took 7 months for a reviewer/reviewers to accept to review, or find one All submissions to Springer and Discover journals are first reviewed for completeness and only then sent to be assessed by an Editor who will decide whether they are suitable for peer review. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. 3 days ago · sci投稿状态Reviewers assigned是什么意思? sci论文发表是需要一定审核过程的,每个环节都是有审核状态的,Reviewers assigned指的是选择好审稿人,审稿人一般是编辑部选择好,或者是自己推荐都可以。 Aug 19, 2024 · 向同行评审期刊提交手稿对任何作者或研究者来说都是一个关键时刻。然而,这可能是一项艰巨的任务,常常伴随着困惑和不确定性。最令人困惑的情况之一就是手稿的状态从 "Under Review" 变为 "Reviewers Assigned",这让作者质疑这一转变背后的含义。今天我们就通过查尔斯沃思与大家探讨一下 Aug 15, 2022 · 当显示“Reviewers assigned”,说明编辑选好了审稿人,代表稿件进入下一环节。 5、Under review (审稿人正在审稿) 审稿人同意后,要对稿件进行审核,这一过程等待时间较长。 6、Review completed (审稿人提交报告) Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation (ScholarOne), reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. What does it mean? Is it under review by the review Sep 11, 2020 · 1 Answer to this question Answer: This status change does occur occasionally. That could be because the system requires four reviewers, but the editor has only gotten the commitment from three people to review the paper. " However, in your case the status changed back to "Reviewers assigned" within 3 days. I have recently resubmitted a piece of 2nd R&R "provisional acceptance, review required". The status of the manuscript says 'Reviewers Assigned' for about 24 days. Sep 3, 2025 · Editorial Manager displays status terms as described in the table below. I have a revised manuscript which I submitted to Nature Communications. In turn, the most probable reasons for getting more reviewers are 1) divergent reviews, and 2) review (s) submitted was not helpful. Mar 18, 2025 · Note Review of groups whose membership is governed through PIM for groups assigns only active owners as the reviewers. If the reported status remains “Reviewers Assigned”, but the time-stamp changes, then the persons asked to review the work have declined. This means that one or more initially assigned peer reviewers were unable to review the manuscript for any or all of a variety of reasons: unavailability, identified conflict of interest, and a mismatch with their field. Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Some examples include “editor assigned,” “reviewers invited,” “under review,” “review complete,” “decision pending,” and others. This post will walk you through the peer-review process, show you how reviewers are […] Aug 12, 2025 · Reviewers have a broad range of scientific expertise and background. Oct 30, 2019 · 大概今年2月份投的Springer,从3-9月状态是under review,整整6个月…然后状态就又变成reviewer assigned… Jul 7, 2020 · For example, journals can configure status changes that give authors transparency into various stages within the review process that the submission will move through. If the internal reviews are positive, the editor will send it out and the status changes to Reviewers assigned again, then Under Review again. If there are no active owners when the review begins, the fallback reviewers are assigned to the review. May 27, 2020 · 1 Answer to this question Answer: This status change – back to ‘Under Review’ from ‘Reviewers Assigned’ – is not uncommon and usually means either of two things. The authors can still be asked for explanations for certain points raised by the referees The peer review status may initially transition from ‘Submitted’ to ‘Under Review’ once the manuscript is assigned to peer reviewers. Thus the subsequent status “under review” means that the manuscript has been sent Nov 20, 2024 · We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains everything our editors and peer reviewers need to perform a fair and thorough assessment of your work. Following this, it may shift to ‘Required Review Completed’ when the editor receives feedback from all assigned reviewers. At least one fallback reviewer is required to review these groups. Eligible owners aren't included. Feb 28, 2022 · The status change from "required reviews completed" to "assigned back to editor" indicates that the content review of the paper by the relevant academic reviewers is now complete and that the Dec 4, 2023 · 请问SCI大修返修后状态从under review变成reviewers assigned是怎么回事? 关注者 3 被浏览 Jul 22, 2021 · Q: Why would a revised manuscript following very minor revisions appear as “reviewers assigned” in the editorial manager system? Jun 1, 2023 · 为啥Reviewers assigned 3个月后,投稿状态又变回Under review? 稿件提交后,如果顺利通过初审,来到外审阶段,编辑会邀请2-3名审稿人审稿。 Code review assignments automatically choose and assign reviewers based on one of two possible algorithms. May 27, 2017 · Answer: The "Reviewers assigned" status indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Q:我大概 2 个月前投稿到 Springer 期刊,系统目前的状态是 reviewers assigned。大概要多久才能催稿? A:每个期刊有的状态类型不一样,所以你的期刊没有 under review 这个状态也说不定,有些期刊会用 Reviewers … May 28, 2024 · 向同行评审期刊提交手稿对任何作者或研究者来说都是一个关键时刻。然而,这可能是一项艰巨的任务,常常伴随着困惑和不确定性。最令人困惑的情况之一就是手稿的状态从 "Under Review" 变为 "Reviewers Assigned",这让作者质疑这一转变背后的含义。 手稿状态的变化 尽管同行评审可能是一个耗时数月的 Once the decision has been made to peer-review the paper, the choice of referees is made by the editor who has been assigned the manuscript, who will be handling other papers in the same field, in Nov 20, 2024 · We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains everything our editors and peer reviewers need to perform a fair and thorough assessment of your work. May 23, 2020 · Sometimes, a reviewer may pull out after being assigned, for reasons of a lack of time, mismatch (with their subject area), or conflict of interest. It is indeed a stressful time and the obsessive need to constantly check updates makes it worse. Specify accounts that have permission to access the repository. Once you've identified possible study sections/scientific review groups that fit your application well, look at the rosters for the review group. Oct 13, 2023 · 英文论文发表中,会通过更新发表状态告知作者进程,好让作者知晓论文当下是什么情况。这发表的英文论文状态Reviewers Assigned什么意思?向审稿人发出邀请。 英文论文想要录用,必须通过审稿,这是大家众所周知的事… Jul 12, 2023 · Un-assigned After Agreeing to Review: shows the uninvited date. Jul 10, 2016 · The first mission of the editor is to assign reviewers and take a decision depending on their return. Thus the subsequent status “under review” means that the manuscript has been sent out for review. Explore what’s involved here. Generally it takes 4 to 8 weeks or even more for an initial decision Jul 15, 2019 · The status “reviewers assigned” indicates that the reviewers had accepted the invitation to review your paper. Oct 30, 2019 · 大概今年2月份投的Springer,从3-9月状态是under review,整整6个月…然后状态就又变成reviewer assigned… Nov 20, 2024 · We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains everything our editors and peer reviewers need to perform a fair and thorough assessment of your work. Decision after review and revision Manage peer review activities On Reviewer Hub, you can find information about your review invitations including the manuscript's abstract, pending reviews, upcoming deadlines, and your review history across Elsevier journals connected to Editorial Manager. Since the status “Reviewer assigned” appeared just a few days after submission, I think it refers to the internal review. If the manuscript status has been showing “under consideration” for a long time, there are a couple of possibilities: reviewers might be getting shortlisted, reviewers may not have been invited yet, or invited reviewers may not have accepted the invitation. With reviewers, you can use new search queries, "protect" branches, assign reviewers with CODEOWNERS, and build deeper API integrations around review assignment and workflows manually or through tools like PullApprove. Jun 16, 2022 · I had submitted a review article in one of the springer journals one year ago and the status form 11 months was "Reviewers assigned" but the date was changing every 10-12 daysone week ago sent Jul 26, 2024 · If your manuscript goes from "review completed" to "reviewers assigned", the most probable explanation is that the editor has decided to get more reviewers. For papers accepted after minor revision, the revised papers are often published without another full process of peer review. Understand their roles, streamline your workflow, and enhance collaboration in Git. It’s only when the status changes to ‘Under Review,’ as you have rightly understood, that the actual review begins. The manuscript was assigned to the requisite number of peer reviewers (two or three), but due to various reasons, one or more reviewers declined to review. Either: The editor has already received the necessary reviews, and is taking a decision Reviewers Assigned 后 under review又变成Reviewers Assigned可能是之前同意审稿的专家因故不能审稿,责编重新邀请审稿人。 如果只是邀请新的审稿人,会引起under review日期变化,不会导致状态变为Reviewers Assigned。. :-) Explore the differences between git assignee vs reviewer. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally, 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Under review. The status “reviewers assigned” indicates that the reviewers accepted the invitation to review your paper. Hence the first Editor Assigned to Under Review. However, the Under Review status changed to Reviewers Assigned on Oct 17 and again to Reviewers Assigned on Oct 19. anyeod ooxvbq rsznd jrq lzjmr ppkryz akbbvgc vkd unbptv ekgh raybc jmpnaj ajxx tiuo uzrgqmh