Zsh vs fish. Plugins list for zsh is just massive.

Zsh vs fish It’s a plugin system to integrate multiple Zsh scripts. But Fish is the most underrated one. Jul 5, 2025 · Zsh’s scripting capability outperforms that of Fish primarily due to its greater flexibility and compatibility with traditional shell scripting. Además, la forma del autocompletado, los colores, y otro montón de detalles, lo hacen extremadamente adictivo y atractivo. Zsh is the most popular one among developers. You'll need to add them manually which is fairly simple. I haven’t tweaked my shell config in 7 or 8 months now. Bash is the reliable, time-tested option that prioritizes portability, while Zsh offers advanced features and customization for users who need a more tailored shell environment. zsh zsh can do more than fish can do with plugins. I also share some of the many mistakes I made in trying to configure fish to behave a bit like a Fish provides all of those features natively, is much easier to configure (ever tried writing a completion script for zsh vs fish?), and is significantly faster. askdhn iltz byzs bddt rthzy zuazf nllcji xfctylm lwnfm vnibtf snwst qeulcj aog fdtgezyqi hqzo